Thanks to Aitkin County Land Commissioner Mark Jacobs for posting such a thoughtful comment in response to my blog post summarizing some of the conversation I overheard at the end of the Forest Values/Carbon Markets conference.
Mark explains that his interest in participating in the Manomet Center’s Northwoods Carbon Study was to “test” the carbon credit system in a real world situation and thereby help forest managers in Minnesota make better informed decisions on the potential costs and benefits of participating in a carbon credit payment system.
Mark writes, “as a public forest land manager involved in this project my question throughout this study has been. can Aitkin County forests provide benefits from the carbon credit market without adversely impacting the other benefits that our forests provide?”
Mark’s answer (so far)? Yes (probably).
While emphasizing that the study remains underway with much work still to be done, Mark reports that his initial impression is that there are things that can be done to increase carbon storage without adversely impacting Minnesota’s local forest industry. In a message detailing the Business.
As Usual (BAU) and alternative harvest scenarios developed for the study, Mark explains: “Based on the (study results) so far I see that our forest management system and forests store a great deal of carbon but that does not mean that it is eligible for compensation. With some minor adjustments and without reducing timber harvest volumes we could market a considerable amount of carbon credits, if the yet to be determined trade-offs are palatable. If nothing else this study has shown that forest management can play an important role in carbon storage, but the system is not set up to recognize that fact. As forest managers we should get more involved in this issue now when the systems are in their infancy.

